What are you looking for?
Aslan A suitable plasticizer lowers the glass-transition temperature and increases polymer-chain mobility while maintaining optical clarity, mechanical performance, and long-term permanence. At Yuanyide, we produce a range of plasticizers including DOTP, DPHP, TOTM, DOA, DEHCH and DOS for items like films, cables, and artificial leather. For transparent PVC, we suggest identifying your optical goals first. After that, you should check for compatibility, efficiency, and migration. Finally, verify the recipe through rigorous testing.
Transparent PVC goods have varied needs for optical performance. Before you pick a plasticizer, determine the target clarity alongside thickness and hardness levels. Doing this prevents choosing a softener that looks good initially but causes haze or discoloration later on.
Plasticizer color is one factor that can influence the appearance of clear PVC. However, Pt-Co color is a raw-material color specification rather than a direct measurement of finished-PVC transparency. Final optical performance should be evaluated using haze, total transmittance, and color measurements on the finished PVC formulation. While these raw material scores are helpful, they are mainly benchmarks. You must still test them in your specific blend to ensure the final product stays clear.
A formulation may initially meet its optical requirements but develop plasticizer exudation, surface blooming, tackiness, or increased haze during aging or storage. Plasticizer migration, exudation, extraction, and volatile loss can alter surface appearance and long-term optical performance.
A suitable plasticizer should exhibit good compatibility with PVC and form a stable, homogeneous polymer–plasticizer phase during processing. Poor compatibility may result in phase separation, plasticizer exudation, or surface blooming. Yuanyide DOTP is designed to provide good compatibility with PVC, together with low migration and good permanence. Similarly, DPHP provides good compatibility with PVC and can offer a favorable balance of plasticizing efficiency, permanence, and durability.
| Property | DEHCH | DOTP | DINCH | DOP | What It Means for Clear PVC |
| Molecular Weight | 394 | 390 | 425 | 390 | Similar molecular-weight range except DINCH |
| Plasticizer Absorption Time (sec) | 172 | 230 | 262 | 170 | DEHCH absorbs faster than DOTP and DINCH and is close to DOP |
| Plasticization Time (sec) | 190 | 288 | 398 | 106 | DEHCH plasticizes faster than DOTP and DINCH, although DOP remains faster |
| Shore A Hardness | 79.2 | 82.1 | 82.5 | 78.5 | Lower hardness at equal loading indicates stronger softening performance |
| Plasticizing Efficiency* | 1.01 | 1.05 | 1.05 | 1.00 | DEHCH approaches DOP and performs better than DOTP/DINCH on this basis |
| Transmittance (%) | 90.1 | 88.3 | 89.5 | 89.6 | Highest transmittance among the four samples |
| Haze (%) | 3.5 | 4.7 | 11.3 | 2.6 | Lower haze than DOTP and DINCH; DOP remains lower |
| Initial Yellowness Index (YI) | 7.8 | 10.1 | 8.8 | 8.8 | Lowest initial YI in this comparison |
| Tensile Strength (kgf/cm²) | 179 | 193 | 180 | 181 | Mechanical performance remains broadly comparable |
| Elongation (%) | 338 | 346 | 331 | 291 | Comparable elongation to DOTP/DINCH and higher than DOP |
| Migration (%) | 0.03 | 0.64 | 0.26 | 0.01 | DEHCH is much lower than DOTP and DINCH and close to DOP |
| Thermal Stability (min) | 82 | 93 | 82 | 80 | DOTP performs better on this specific thermal-stability measurement |
| Cold Resistance (°C) | -33.4 | -32.2 | -33.4 | -31.4 | DEHCH provides better low-temperature performance than DOTP and DOP |
| Heat Loss, 200°C/1 h (%) | 1.63 | 0.73 | 1.40 | 2.03 | DOTP shows lower heat loss under this test condition |
Test formulation: PVC-1000 100 phr, plasticizer 50 phr, heat stabilizer 2.0 phr, ESO 2.0 phr, and lubricant 0.5 phr. Results apply to this specific formulation and test setup and should be verified in the buyer’s own PVC system.The following test formulation and results are based on publicly available third-party competitor data.
| Performance Priority | Best Choice | Key Comparison Data |
| Faster processing efficiency | DEHCH | DEHCH: 172/190 sec; DOTP: 230/288 sec; DINCH: 262/398 sec |
| High transparency applications | DEHCH | DEHCH: 90.1% transmittance, 3.5% haze |
| Low initial color requirement | DEHCH | DEHCH initial YI: 7.8 (lowest among tested samples) |
| Migration resistance | DEHCH / DOP comparison | DEHCH: 0.03%; DOP: 0.01%; DOTP/DINCH higher |
| Long-term appearance after aging | DEHCH | After 500 h aging: DEHCH YI 15.6 vs DOTP 27.5 |
| Thermal stability | DOTP | DOTP showed better heat loss and stability performance in this test |
| Low-temperature flexibility | DEHCH / DINCH | Both DEHCH and DINCH reached -33.4°C |
It is best to compare efficiency based on target hardness rather than just the amount used. DEHCH provides higher plasticizing efficiency than DOTP, resulting in lower hardness at comparable loading levels. This makes DEHCH a potential option when high plasticizing efficiency and optical clarity are both important.
Plasticizer migration or exudation can cause surface tackiness and may adversely affect printability, coating adhesion, lamination, or contact with adjacent materials. This is a major concern when your PVC touches other materials like adhesives or coatings.
DOTP generally provides good permanence, including low volatility, low migration, and good resistance to extraction. For applications requiring higher permanence and thermal stability, TOTM can be considered as a primary plasticizer.
TOTM offers high permanence, low volatility, and low migration, making it suitable for PVC formulations exposed to elevated temperatures.
DPHP is another durable option that offers low volatility for long-lasting performance.
| Performance Indicator | DEHCH | DOTP | DINCH | DOP | What the Data Suggests |
| Migration Value | 0.03% | 0.64% | 0.26% | 0.01% | DEHCH showed significantly lower migration than DOTP and DINCH, with performance close to DOP in this comparative test. |
| Migration Resistance | Excellent | Moderate | Better than DOTP but higher than DEHCH | Excellent | DEHCH can be considered for applications requiring improved migration control, while DOP showed the lowest migration value in this test. |
| Potential Application Impact | Suitable for clear PVC laminated structures, coated materials, decorative films, and products in contact with adjacent surfaces | Higher migration may increase the risk of surface tack, staining, adhesion issues, or appearance changes | Lower migration than DOTP but still higher than DEHCH | Lowest migration performance in this comparison | Lower migration behavior can help maintain surface quality and long-term appearance stability. |
Cold weather can make PVC brittle and prone to cracking. Yuanyide DOA is built to handle the cold while resisting light and water. DOS also performs well in freezing temperatures and stays compatible with the resin, making both ideal for outdoor films or cables.
If your product faces high heat, you need a plasticizer with low volatility and good thermal permanence. TOTM is suitable for elevated-temperature PVC applications because of its low volatility, low migration, and high permanence. DPHP also works well here, providing the thermal aging resistance required for industrial parts.
| Performance Indicator | DEHCH | DOTP | Comparison Result | Application Significance |
| Transmittance | 90.1% | 88.3% | DEHCH showed higher light transmittance | Better suited for transparent PVC sheets and decorative films where visual clarity is important |
| Haze | 3.5% | 4.7% | DEHCH achieved lower haze | Helps improve transparency and surface appearance in clear PVC applications |
| Initial YI (Yellow Index) | 7.8 | 10.1 | DEHCH showed lower initial color value | Provides better initial color performance for appearance-sensitive PVC products |
| Overall Optical Performance | Better transparency and lower initial color | Good optical performance but slightly lower than DEHCH in this test | DEHCH demonstrated advantages in clarity and color appearance | Suitable for clear PVC applications requiring both appearance quality and material consistency |
Note: Data shown are based on a specific comparative formulation and test setup. Actual performance may vary depending on PVC formulation, processing conditions, plasticizer dosage, and final application requirements.
For clear items used near heat sources, TOTM or DPHP are preferred. They generally provide higher permanence and lower migration/volatility than many conventional plasticizers. This can help maintain flexibility and optical performance during long-term service when the overall formulation is properly designed and stabilized.
Test several blends while keeping your resin and stabilizers the same. Yuanyide can collect your application requirements, provide available product documentation and samples, and coordinate testing with the production facility or your laboratory before bulk purchasing. The final formulation should be selected and validated by the customer based on the specific application and finished-product requirements.
Measure haze, total luminous transmittance, color or yellowness, hardness, tensile strength, and elongation at break. Depending on the application, also evaluate low-temperature flexibility, heat aging, plasticizer migration, extraction resistance, and volatility. These tests help determine that your flexibility hasn’t come at the cost of the “look” or the strength of the material.
Formulating flexible PVC with high optical clarity requires balancing plasticizing efficiency, PVC compatibility, permanence, thermal performance, and optical properties. You must consider how the plasticizer interacts with the PVC matrix and responds to processing and service conditions. Yuanyide provides a variety of options like DOTP, DPHP, TOTM, DOA, DOS, and DEHCH to meet these different needs.
No single product is perfect for every situation. Testing your full formulation is the only way to be sure that transparency and performance stay high. Contact Yuanyide today to discuss your clear PVC needs and request samples for your next project.
A: For general-purpose clear PVC, DOTP is a common starting point because of its balance of compatibility, permanence, and processing performance. When maximum transparency, initial color, plasticizing efficiency, and migration resistance are prioritized, DEHCH may be a stronger candidate. The final selection should be confirmed through haze, transmittance, hardness, migration, and aging tests.
A: Yes. Plasticizer purity, compatibility with PVC, plasticizer loading, processing conditions, and interactions with stabilizers and other additives can all affect haze, transmittance, and color stability.
A: Compare formulations under the same resin, stabilizer, plasticizer phr, processing, and specimen conditions. Depending on the application, test transmittance, haze, Yellow Index (YI), hardness, tensile strength, elongation, migration or exudation, volatility or extraction resistance, and low-temperature or heat-aging performance. Keeping these conditions consistent makes it easier to evaluate how different plasticizers affect the overall performance of clear PVC.
